Corporate
Showing 997 - 1002 of 2624 results.
How Can a Trucking Accident Lawsuit Help You Recover Damages Effectively?
A trucking accident lawsuit involves distinct legal complexities because commercial vehicles operate under federal and state regulations that do not apply to passenger cars, and liability often extends beyond the driver to include the trucking company, maintenance contractors, and cargo loaders. As a victim, you face a longer discovery process than typical motor vehicle claims because trucking companies maintain extensive compliance records, maintenance logs, and driver qualification files that can reveal negligence or regulatory violations. The defendant's insurance often has substantial resources to defend the case, which means your claim will likely involve expert testimony on vehicle mechanics, driver fatigue, and industry standards. Understanding how these elements differ from a standard car accident lawsuit helps you prepare for the investigation and negotiation phases ahead.
Read more
Motorcycle Accident Litigation: Which Steps Lead to Compensation?
Motorcycle accident claims involve distinct legal and procedural complexities that differ significantly from standard vehicle collision cases. Riders face heightened injury risk and often confront assumptions about fault that require careful factual development and expert analysis. Understanding how courts evaluate causation, comparative negligence, and damages in motorcycle accidents helps you assess your claim's strength early and identify what documentation and evidence will matter most. Litigation in this area demands attention to both the mechanics of the collision and the specific vulnerabilities of motorcycle operation.
Read more
Corporate Governance in M&A: Board Duties in a New York Acquisition
In a New York acquisition, corporate governance decides who bears liability, and a business acquisition lawyer helps the board defend its duties and process. When shareholders challenge a deal, the fight is rarely about price alone. It turns on whether the board gathered enough information, managed conflicts, and documented its reasoning. This guide explains how corporate governance shapes fiduciary duties, shareholder approval, and board liability in a New York acquisition.
Read more
How Does an Antitrust Attorney Navigate ITAR and EAR Compliance in NYC?
ITAR and EAR violations can trigger antitrust liability. NYC antitrust attorney explains key compliance strategies for defense and export firms. An antitrust attorney who understands both export control and competition law will tell you directly: ITAR and EAR compliance does not exist in isolation. Misclassification, unlicensed exports, and inadequate deemed export controls often trigger antitrust exposure that companies never see coming. In my experience advising defense contractors and dual-use technology exporters, a single compliance gap can simultaneously attract DOJ scrutiny under the Sherman Act and enforcement action from the State or Commerce Department. If your company operates in these sectors, consulting an antitrust attorney before enforcement contact is not just advisable; it is essential.
Read more
Product Liability Law and Legal Theories in New York
Three theories reach the same product, and they expire at different times. Strict liability asks about the product. The plaintiff need not show the manufacturer was careless — only that the product was not reasonably safe and that the defect caused the injury. Negligence asks about the conduct: whether reasonable care was used in design, manufacture, or inspection. In design cases the two analyses largely converge. Breach of warranty is contract law, which changes both what is recoverable and when. It reaches purely economic loss that tort claims do not, and it runs four years from delivery under the UCC — not from when the defect appeared. A claim time-barred in tort may survive in warranty, and the reverse happens just as often. Damage to the product itself is not a tort claim. Where a product fails and injures only itself, New York confines the claim to contract and warranty. The distinction between a product that breaks and a product that breaks something else determines which theories are available at all. Liability runs down the chain. Manufacturers, importers, distributors, and retailers are each subject to strict liability — which matters when the manufacturer is offshore or insolvent, and which is why indemnity arrangements among them become a second dispute inside the first.
Read more
How Does the Corporate Tax Refund Process Work in New York?
A corporation that has overpaid can ask for the money back, but the request is examined rather than granted, and the two tax systems run on separate tracks. On the federal side, a refund claim must be filed within three years of filing the return or two years of paying the tax, whichever is later (26 U.S.C. § 6511). New York applies its own period under Tax Law § 1087, and where the overpayment follows a federal adjustment, Tax Law § 211(3) requires the corporation to report the final federal determination within ninety days — one hundred twenty for a combined filer — with the claim due within two years of that reporting deadline. Reporting late does not forfeit the tax, but interest stops being payable on the portion attributable to the federal change. Amended returns claiming substantial credits draw review more often than routine ones, and the records that supported the original return are usually what determines the outcome. Certain deductions carry strict substantiation requirements that cannot be satisfied after the fact, and a claim advanced without a reasonable basis exposes the taxpayer to a penalty of twenty percent of the excessive amount under § 6676. What counsel does in a refund matter is review the filed returns against the underlying records, identify the positions worth claiming and those that are not, assemble the substantiation that already exists, and represent the company if the claim is examined or denied.
Read more