Cross-border & International Transaction
Showing 163 - 168 of 352 results.
How Prejudgment Attachment of Foreign Bank Accounts Works
Prejudgment attachment of foreign bank accounts may preserve reachable assets before a final money judgment.Article 62 sets statutory grounds for attaching property before judgment. Cross-border bank accounts raise separate questions about the proper garnishee, levy mechanics, and foreign branches. Rule 64 allows federal courts to use applicable state attachment remedies.
Read more
Overseas Entity Capital Remittance and OFAC Compliance Guide
Overseas entity capital remittance compliance requires navigating OFAC sanctions, tax reporting, and foreign exchange laws under federal authority. Executing international fund transfers requires managing complex regulatory frameworks. Understanding federal statutory standards helps protect corporate assets and mitigate civil or criminal enforcement risks.
Read more
SIAC International Arbitration Attorney: Award Enforcement Strategies
Confirming an award and collecting on it are two different proceedings. Confirmation converts the award into a U.S. .udgment. Under the New York Convention as implemented by the Federal Arbitration Act, a petition may be brought within three years of the award — a longer window than domestic awards receive. Confirmation does not, by itself, restrain anything. Restraining assets requires separate enforcement steps, and a respondent who sees the petition coming has time to move money. The grounds for resisting are narrow and exclusive. Article V lists them: no valid agreement, inadequate notice, the tribunal exceeded its mandate, defective composition, annulment at the seat, or public policy. U.S. .ourts construe these narrowly and do not revisit the merits — which is why an arbitral award is generally easier to enforce here than a foreign court judgment. A parallel set-aside action changes the calculus. Where the losing party moves to annul at the seat, a U.S. .ourt may adjourn the enforcement proceeding pending that outcome. For an award seated in Singapore, that means the timing of your U.S. .etition and the status of any Singapore proceeding have to be managed together. Jurisdiction over the respondent still matters. A petition in New York needs a basis — assets here, or a presence sufficient to support it. Locating those assets is work that belongs before the petition, not after.
Read more
KCAB International Arbitration Attorney for Contract Disputes
KCAB charges by the amount in dispute, not by the hour. Arbitrator fees and administrative charges are calculated on the claim value under a published schedule. A proceeding that runs longer does not, by itself, increase what the tribunal costs — which distinguishes KCAB from institutions that bill arbitrator time. Counsel fees still scale with duration, and they remain the larger share of any budget. Which rules apply is decided by your arbitration clause. KCAB administers international cases under a separate set of rules from domestic ones, and clauses that do not specify create an argument before the merits are reached. Document production works differently than U.S. .itigation. International arbitration follows a narrower model: requests must identify specific documents or narrow categories, and broad discovery is unavailable. For a U.S. .arty, this changes evidence strategy from the outset. What you cannot obtain later, you must secure before the dispute begins. The reason to arbitrate is usually enforcement. Korea and the United States are both parties to the New York Convention, so an award rendered in Seoul is enforceable in U.S. .ourts. A Korean court judgment is not — there is no treaty between the two countries on recognition of judgments. For contracts with Korean counterparties, that gap is often the whole case for an arbitration clause.
Read more
Find an HKIAC Emergency Relief and Interim Measures Attorney
HKIAC international arbitration attorney services assist companies in securing emergency relief, interim measures, and cross-border enforcement. Resolving disputes under Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre rules demands swift action during emergency proceedings. Executives facing asset risk must manage seat elections and interim measures. Retaining skilled legal representatives protects commercial assets and enforces cross-border rights.
Read more
International IPO Specialist Law Firm: How Cross-Border Issuers Select Counsel
Selecting an international IPO specialist law firm requires foreign issuers to evaluate SEC registration authority, corporate structure alignment, and securities litigation defense capabilities. Foreign Private Issuer status expands regulatory flexibility under Federal Securities Laws, yet choosing an incompatible corporate vehicle complicates mandatory disclosure filings. Underwriting syndicates often push preferred legal advisors, but issuers must retain independent legal representation to protect long-term governance interests. Legal executives should evaluate whether candidate firms maintain internal securities litigation defense capabilities or outsource post-IPO class-action risk management.
Read more